Dr Ann Hansford joined the University of Exeter Business School in 2012 following 15 years in academic posts. Prior to that Ann was a tax manager dealing with practical tax issues for a range of clients from high net worth individuals to multinational companies.
This varied background is reflected in her current research interests that build on the extensive collaborative research work she has done with international academic colleagues. The study she is engaged with currently is a multi-country investigation into tax compliance costs with data being collected with colleagues on four continents. Environmental tax is also a current research interest with papers based on her research being given at conferences in USA, Europe and Australia. Ann was a visiting Research Fellow at ATAX, University of NSW, Sydney and she spent a sabbatical there in 2007.
- International tax compliance costs
- Environmental tax
- Self assessment and IT adoption strategies
- The philosophy of taxation and the is/ought question
Compliance costs are the costs incurred by individuals and businesses in order to comply with the, seemingly, ever more complex tax system. Our work is systematically assessing the actual costs of complying with the tax regulations across various countries. We focus on not only the burdens on business but also the potential benefits of tax concessions and incentives together with investigating the managerial benefits that may result.
Environmental taxes are a growing area of tax research as governments endeavour to extend the tax base ever wider to compensate for the reduction in the headline rates of income and business taxes.
Self assessment is the process by which most developed countries collect information and assess the tax liability of individuals and business. Moving to an IT based system has extended the issues tax policy makers have to consider together with those for businesses and how they can integrate these government based requirements into the normal business accounting activities.
The greater the complexity within the tax systems, the greater the need to review the axiomatic base upon which assumptions are based and this raises interesting fundamental questions. Most would agree that there is a need to generate tax revenues but who, exactly, ought to be responsible and to what extent?