Key publications
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, den Hartog D, van Knippenberg D (2022). A Critical Review of the Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Empirical Literature on Cognition‐Based and Affect‐Based Trust.
Journal of Management Studies,
60(2), 495-537.
DOI.
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, Den Hartog D (2020). A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology DOI.
van der Werff L, Legood A, Buckley F, Weibel A, de Cremer D (2019). Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions.
Organizational Psychology Review,
9, 2-3.
Abstract:
Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions
Theorizing about trust has focused predominantly on cognitive trust cues such as trustworthiness, portraying the trustor as a relatively passive observer reacting to the attributes of the other party. Using self-determination and control theories of motivation, we propose a model of trust motivation that explores the intraindividual processes involved in the volitional aspects of trust decision-making implied by the definition of trust as a willingness to be vulnerable. We distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of trust and propose a two-phase model of trust goal setting and trust regulation. Our model offers a dynamic view of the trusting process and a framework for understanding how trust cognition, affect and behavior interact over time. Furthermore, we discuss how trust goals may be altered or abandoned via a feedback loop during the trust regulation process. We conclude with a discussion of potential implications for existing theory and future research.
Abstract.
DOI.
Martin R, Thomas G, Legood A, Dello Russo S (2018). Leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR,
39(2), 151-168.
Author URL.
DOI.
Hughes D, Lee AJR, Tian A, Newman A, Legood A (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations.
Leadership Quarterly DOI.
Publications by category
Journal articles
Busch C, Crawshaw J, Guillaume Y, Legood A (2023). Ethics‐Related Mentoring: a Scale Development and Test of its Role in Promoting Protégé Ethical Behaviour.
British Journal of Management DOI.
Martin R, Ono M, Legood A, Dello Russo S, Thomas G (2023). Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: a daily diary study.
J Occup Health Psychol,
28(2), 103-116.
Abstract:
Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: a daily diary study.
Guided by self-determination and social exchange theories, we examine how leader-member exchange (LMX) quality impacts follower well-being. Despite LMX relationships being dynamic in nature, the way relationship quality varies over time and its impact on well-being has not been examined in detail. To address this important issue, a daily diary study is reported of employees from a variety of organizations. One hundred and fifty-eight participants completed a daily diary in the morning and evening for five consecutive workdays (k = 603 observations). Measures included hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, and social and economic LMX exchanges. There was a significant variation of LMX quality over the diary days. Daily LMX quality predicted daily follower well-being (while controlling for morning well-being). Further, for those that interacted with their manager, social LMX exchanges but not economic LMX exchanges predicted daily well-being. Interaction characteristics (frequency, time, content) had a relatively small impact on daily well-being. As predicted, work engagement mediated the relation between daily LMX quality and social LMX exchanges (but not daily economic LMX exchanges) with well-being. The results show how LMX quality affects followers' well-being that varies daily, that is affected by leaders' behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Abstract.
Author URL.
DOI.
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, den Hartog D, van Knippenberg D (2022). A Critical Review of the Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Empirical Literature on Cognition‐Based and Affect‐Based Trust.
Journal of Management Studies,
60(2), 495-537.
DOI.
Grabarski MK, Schneider N, Yadav M, Spreitzer GM, Dello Russo S, Wang K, Wurtz O, Dimitrova M, Lazarova MB, Legood A, et al (2022). Stronger Together: Positive Relationships at Work.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2022(1).
DOI.
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, Den Hartog D (2020). A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Crawshaw J, Busch C, Guillaume YRF, Legood A (2020). Ethics-Related Mentoring and Protégé Moral Motivation and Ethical Leadership.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2020(1).
DOI.
Cleveland M, Warhurst A, Legood A (2019). Experiencing resilience through the eyes of early career social workers. British Journal of Social Work
Radulovic A, Thomas G, Epitropaki O, Legood A (2019). Forgiveness in Leader-Member Exchange Relationships: Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Lee A, Legood A, Hughes D, Tian AW, Newman A, Knight C (2019). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
29(1), 1-35.
DOI.
Emery C, Martin R, Thomas G, Martin R, Matta FK, Seo J, Son J, Tse H, Choi D, Dello Russo S, et al (2019). Recent Advances in Leader-Member Exchange Research.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2019(1).
DOI.
van der Werff L, Legood A, Buckley F, Weibel A, de Cremer D (2019). Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions.
Organizational Psychology Review,
9, 2-3.
Abstract:
Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions
Theorizing about trust has focused predominantly on cognitive trust cues such as trustworthiness, portraying the trustor as a relatively passive observer reacting to the attributes of the other party. Using self-determination and control theories of motivation, we propose a model of trust motivation that explores the intraindividual processes involved in the volitional aspects of trust decision-making implied by the definition of trust as a willingness to be vulnerable. We distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of trust and propose a two-phase model of trust goal setting and trust regulation. Our model offers a dynamic view of the trusting process and a framework for understanding how trust cognition, affect and behavior interact over time. Furthermore, we discuss how trust goals may be altered or abandoned via a feedback loop during the trust regulation process. We conclude with a discussion of potential implications for existing theory and future research.
Abstract.
DOI.
Legood A, Lee AJR, Schwarz G, Newman A (2018). From self-defeating to other defeating: Examining the effects of leader procrastination on follower work outcomes.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Martin R, Thomas G, Legood A, Dello Russo S (2018). Leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR,
39(2), 151-168.
Author URL.
DOI.
Hughes D, Lee AJR, Tian A, Newman A, Legood A (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations.
Leadership Quarterly DOI.
Lyubovnikova J, Legood A, Turner N, Mamakouka A (2017). How Authentic Leadership Influences Team Performance: the Mediating Role of Team Reflexivity.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS,
141(1), 59-70.
Author URL.
DOI.
Lee A, Schwarz G, Newman A, Legood A (2017). Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior.
Journal of Business Ethics,
154(1), 109-126.
DOI.
Legood A, McGrath M, Searle R, Lee A (2016). Exploring How Social Workers Experience and Cope with Public Perception of Their Profession.
British Journal of Social Work,
46(7), 1872-1889.
DOI.
Legood A, Thomas G, Sacramento C (2016). Leader trustworthy behavior and organizational trust: the role of the immediate manager for cultivating trust.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,
46(12), 673-686.
Author URL.
DOI.
Martin R, Dello Russo S, Legood A, Thomas G (2015). LMX Differentiation and Work-Related Outcomes: the Role of LMX Comparison Processes.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2015(1).
DOI.
Lee A, Schwarz G, Newman A, Legood A (2015). Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: the Role of Ethical Leadership.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2015(1).
DOI.
Lyubovnikova J, Legood A, Turner N, Mamakouka A (2014). How Authentic Leadership Enhances Group Outcomes: the Role of Team Reflexivity.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2014(1).
DOI.
Chapters
Thomas G, Legood A, Lee A (2014). Why, when and how motivation helps empathic accuracy. In (Ed) Managing Interpersonal Sensitivity: Knowing When - and When Not - to Understand Others, 21-40.
Thomas G, Legood A, Lee A (2011). Why, when, and how motivation helps empathic accuracy. In (Ed) Managing Interpersonal Sensitivity: Knowing When - and When Not - to Understand Others, 21-40.
Publications by year
2023
Busch C, Crawshaw J, Guillaume Y, Legood A (2023). Ethics‐Related Mentoring: a Scale Development and Test of its Role in Promoting Protégé Ethical Behaviour.
British Journal of Management DOI.
Martin R, Ono M, Legood A, Dello Russo S, Thomas G (2023). Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: a daily diary study.
J Occup Health Psychol,
28(2), 103-116.
Abstract:
Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: a daily diary study.
Guided by self-determination and social exchange theories, we examine how leader-member exchange (LMX) quality impacts follower well-being. Despite LMX relationships being dynamic in nature, the way relationship quality varies over time and its impact on well-being has not been examined in detail. To address this important issue, a daily diary study is reported of employees from a variety of organizations. One hundred and fifty-eight participants completed a daily diary in the morning and evening for five consecutive workdays (k = 603 observations). Measures included hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, and social and economic LMX exchanges. There was a significant variation of LMX quality over the diary days. Daily LMX quality predicted daily follower well-being (while controlling for morning well-being). Further, for those that interacted with their manager, social LMX exchanges but not economic LMX exchanges predicted daily well-being. Interaction characteristics (frequency, time, content) had a relatively small impact on daily well-being. As predicted, work engagement mediated the relation between daily LMX quality and social LMX exchanges (but not daily economic LMX exchanges) with well-being. The results show how LMX quality affects followers' well-being that varies daily, that is affected by leaders' behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Abstract.
Author URL.
DOI.
2022
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, den Hartog D, van Knippenberg D (2022). A Critical Review of the Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Empirical Literature on Cognition‐Based and Affect‐Based Trust.
Journal of Management Studies,
60(2), 495-537.
DOI.
Grabarski MK, Schneider N, Yadav M, Spreitzer GM, Dello Russo S, Wang K, Wurtz O, Dimitrova M, Lazarova MB, Legood A, et al (2022). Stronger Together: Positive Relationships at Work.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2022(1).
DOI.
2020
Legood A, van der Werff L, Lee A, Den Hartog D (2020). A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Crawshaw J, Busch C, Guillaume YRF, Legood A (2020). Ethics-Related Mentoring and Protégé Moral Motivation and Ethical Leadership.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2020(1).
DOI.
2019
Cleveland M, Warhurst A, Legood A (2019). Experiencing resilience through the eyes of early career social workers. British Journal of Social Work
Radulovic A, Thomas G, Epitropaki O, Legood A (2019). Forgiveness in Leader-Member Exchange Relationships: Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Lee A, Legood A, Hughes D, Tian AW, Newman A, Knight C (2019). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
29(1), 1-35.
DOI.
Emery C, Martin R, Thomas G, Martin R, Matta FK, Seo J, Son J, Tse H, Choi D, Dello Russo S, et al (2019). Recent Advances in Leader-Member Exchange Research.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2019(1).
DOI.
van der Werff L, Legood A, Buckley F, Weibel A, de Cremer D (2019). Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions.
Organizational Psychology Review,
9, 2-3.
Abstract:
Trust motivation: the self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions
Theorizing about trust has focused predominantly on cognitive trust cues such as trustworthiness, portraying the trustor as a relatively passive observer reacting to the attributes of the other party. Using self-determination and control theories of motivation, we propose a model of trust motivation that explores the intraindividual processes involved in the volitional aspects of trust decision-making implied by the definition of trust as a willingness to be vulnerable. We distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of trust and propose a two-phase model of trust goal setting and trust regulation. Our model offers a dynamic view of the trusting process and a framework for understanding how trust cognition, affect and behavior interact over time. Furthermore, we discuss how trust goals may be altered or abandoned via a feedback loop during the trust regulation process. We conclude with a discussion of potential implications for existing theory and future research.
Abstract.
DOI.
2018
Legood A, Lee AJR, Schwarz G, Newman A (2018). From self-defeating to other defeating: Examining the effects of leader procrastination on follower work outcomes.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology DOI.
Martin R, Thomas G, Legood A, Dello Russo S (2018). Leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR,
39(2), 151-168.
Author URL.
DOI.
Hughes D, Lee AJR, Tian A, Newman A, Legood A (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations.
Leadership Quarterly DOI.
2017
Lyubovnikova J, Legood A, Turner N, Mamakouka A (2017). How Authentic Leadership Influences Team Performance: the Mediating Role of Team Reflexivity.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS,
141(1), 59-70.
Author URL.
DOI.
Lee A, Schwarz G, Newman A, Legood A (2017). Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior.
Journal of Business Ethics,
154(1), 109-126.
DOI.
2016
Legood A, McGrath M, Searle R, Lee A (2016). Exploring How Social Workers Experience and Cope with Public Perception of Their Profession.
British Journal of Social Work,
46(7), 1872-1889.
DOI.
Legood A, Thomas G, Sacramento C (2016). Leader trustworthy behavior and organizational trust: the role of the immediate manager for cultivating trust.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,
46(12), 673-686.
Author URL.
DOI.
2015
Martin R, Dello Russo S, Legood A, Thomas G (2015). LMX Differentiation and Work-Related Outcomes: the Role of LMX Comparison Processes.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2015(1).
DOI.
Lee A, Schwarz G, Newman A, Legood A (2015). Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: the Role of Ethical Leadership.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2015(1).
DOI.
2014
Lyubovnikova J, Legood A, Turner N, Mamakouka A (2014). How Authentic Leadership Enhances Group Outcomes: the Role of Team Reflexivity.
Academy of Management Proceedings,
2014(1).
DOI.
Thomas G, Legood A, Lee A (2014). Why, when and how motivation helps empathic accuracy. In (Ed) Managing Interpersonal Sensitivity: Knowing When - and When Not - to Understand Others, 21-40.
2011
Thomas G, Legood A, Lee A (2011). Why, when, and how motivation helps empathic accuracy. In (Ed) Managing Interpersonal Sensitivity: Knowing When - and When Not - to Understand Others, 21-40.